January 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Recent Posts

« Consumer Protection Laws | Main | Three Edicts of Economic Thought »

August 01, 2007

The Top Three Economic Concepts

Greg Mankiw offers the following:

I organized my principles text to put the most important concepts toward the front of the book. If I had limited time to teach a basic course, I would try to get through the first 10 chapters (out of 36 in the book), perhaps skipping chapter 2 on methodology and 5 on elasticity. Summarizing these chapters in three big ideas is hard, but here goes:

1. Comparative advantage and the gains from trade.

2. Supply, demand, and the efficiency of market equilibrium.

3. Market failure, such as externalities, and the role for government.

The lesson is that we can all gain from economic interdependence and that markets are a good, but not always perfect, way to coordinate people in an interdependent world.

Here are my three:

  1. Comparative advantage
  2. The role of incentives and opportunity costs
  3. How markets spontaneously coordinate individual behavior and improve the human condition.

Note that my #3 is not the same as Mankiw's #2.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/97663/20526152

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Top Three Economic Concepts:

» Three big economics ideas: Mankiw's, Steckbeck's, and mine from Newmark's Door
Greg Mankiw lists his favorites for three big economic ideas. Mark Steckbeck's list is better. Mine is very close to Steckbeck's, just a little different wording and emphasis: 1. People tend to respond to incentives. 2. Scarcity, and its important [Read More]

Comments

Your #2 is not the same as his #3, either.

I just you had done the same type of analysis of what the term "comparative advantage" really means.

Ken, for what its worth - I think he and Greg are on the same page. They are both accepting that Comparative advantage dictates that isolationism/protectionism drives prices higher than they would be with free trade. Why go through the agonizing, cost prohibitive effort of producing coffee in America for American consumers when it is much more cost effective to simply buy it from Columbia (for example)? I think they are using the term correctly in both instances.

A little off topic but Mankiw's decision to skip a chapter on methodology troubles me the most, in that making students more aware that there are methods of analyzing economic issues should mitigate the tendency to turn these issues into ideological and moral battles which would be an overall social benefit.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.